Just click the link below to join us on Facebooks. Besure to become a fan so you can be kept in the loop on new information
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Off-The-Beaten-Path-Maps/98239141820
|
September 09, 2010, 06:15:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
| News: Please feel free to add your comments and adventures to the OTBPMAPS Blog. |
| Home | Help | Search | Login | Register |
|
1
on: August 03, 2010, 04:35:34 PM
|
||
| Started by Monte Wells - Last post by Monte Wells | ||
|
Just click the link below to join us on Facebooks. Besure to become a fan so you can be kept in the loop on new information
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Off-The-Beaten-Path-Maps/98239141820 |
||
|
2
on: March 10, 2010, 09:49:14 AM
|
||
| Started by Monte Wells - Last post by Monte Wells | ||
|
NEW SPOT INFORMATION
Here is some information from SPOT on how to tell the difference between the recalled and fixed units. March 9th, 2010, Dear Valued Distribution Partners, We are starting to ship SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger (SPOT-2) to the channel. Here are instructions to distinguish between the recalled and fixed units: Go to our Facebooks page for more details http://www.facebook.com/note.php?saved&&suggest¬e_id=10150113407035372&id=98239141820 |
||
|
3
on: December 19, 2009, 10:50:00 PM
|
||
| Started by Monte Wells - Last post by bivankBoiva | ||
|
the human race will not dissapear. were too advanced to dissapear now. only a catastrophic black hole will make us vanish from existence. global warming will be like catching the cold. we wont die off but well definetly take a blow. well adapt though, we always do.
|
||
|
4
on: December 12, 2009, 12:15:48 PM
|
||
| Started by Monte Wells - Last post by bivankBoiva | ||
|
Does anybody know the kind of radio I need to be looking that is compatible with the forest service, I know Art said he had a Bendix, but which model do I need. Are they VHF or UHF or something else.
|
||
|
5
on: December 07, 2009, 09:59:41 AM
|
||
| Started by Monte Wells - Last post by Monte Wells | ||
|
Thanks for making your comments. I would like to ask you to re-read part of the article. I have posted it below. The article in a nutshell is saying that the ice sheet fluctuates continually but that over the last 30 years they have expanded. This article plus the one I have pasted below this one give you some facts that you are not going to hear from the main stream media.
The reason for posting this information is to get folks to start looking at this issue and asking some simple questions: What is man doing today that would cause such a change and does man really have the power to destroy the world? How has the world evolved over time and space and overcome other major world disasters Pre-man & during mans time on this earth to date? Look at how much carbon volcanoes put into the atmosphere (http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/hazards/gas/index.php), look at the global ice age patterns (http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html), Look at Mount St Helen's eruption 1980 and the Yellowstone eruption 2.1 million years ago (http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2005/3024/) and then ask yourself if the God Complex of man that the Global Warming movement is pushing really hold any water. While obtaining my education in Archaeology, one professor drilled into our heads to always look outside the box and to critically think things through. Since then that is what I do with most everything. When I put the global warming issue and other environmental issues to this process I have no problem distinguishing fact from fictions. I challenge all my forum readers to do the same thing. World News Antarctic ice is growing, not melting away By Greg Roberts The Australian Australian Antarctic Division glaciology program head Ian Allison said sea ice losses in west Antarctica over the past 30 years had been more than offset by increases in the Ross Sea region, just one sector of east Antarctica. "Sea ice conditions have remained stable in Antarctica generally," Dr Allison said. The melting of sea ice - fast ice and pack ice - does not cause sea levels to rise because the ice is in the water. Sea levels may rise with losses from freshwater ice sheets on the polar caps. In Antarctica, these losses are in the form of icebergs calved from ice shelves formed by glacial movements on the mainland. Last week, federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett said experts predicted sea level rises of up to 6m from Antarctic melting by 2100, but the worst case scenario foreshadowed by the SCAR report was a 1.25m rise. Mr Garrett insisted global warming was causing ice losses throughout Antarctica. "I don't think there's any doubt it is contributing to what we've seen both on the Wilkins shelf and more generally in Antarctica," he said. Dr Allison said there was not any evidence of significant change in the mass of ice shelves in east Antarctica nor any indication that its ice cap was melting. "The only significant calvings in Antarctica have been in the west," he said. And he cautioned that calvings of the magnitude seen recently in west Antarctica might not be unusual. "Ice shelves in general have episodic carvings and there can be large icebergs breaking off - I'm talking 100km or 200km long - every 10 or 20 or 50 years." Ice core drilling in the fast ice off Australia's Davis Station in East Antarctica by the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Co-Operative Research Centre shows that last year, the ice had a maximum thickness of 1.89m, its densest in 10 years. The average thickness of the ice at Davis since the 1950s is 1.67m. A paper to be published soon by the British Antarctic Survey in the journal Geophysical Research Letters is expected to confirm that over the past 30 years, the area of sea ice around the continent has expanded. It's time to pray for global warming by John Tomlinson | Monday January 19, 2009, 4:20 AM If you're wondering why North America is starting to resemble nuclear winter, then you missed the news. At December's U.N. Global Warming conference in Poznan, Poland, 650 of the world's top climatologists stood up and said man-made global warming is a media generated myth without basis. Said climatologist Dr. David Gee, Chairman of the International Geological Congress, "For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming?" I asked myself, why would such obviously smart guy say such a ridiculous thing? But it turns out he's right. The earth's temperature peaked in 1998. It's been falling ever since; it dropped dramatically in 2007 and got worse in 2008, when temperatures touched 1980 levels. Meanwhile, the University of Illinois' Arctic Climate Research Center released conclusive satellite photos showing that Arctic ice is back to 1979 levels. What's more, measurements of Antarctic ice now show that its accumulation is up 5 percent since 1980. In other words, during what was supposed to be massive global warming, the biggest chunks of ice on earth grew larger. Just as an aside, do you remember when the hole in the ozone layer was going to melt Antarctica? But don't worry, we're safe now, that was the nineties. Dr. Kunihiko, Chancellor of Japan's Institute of Science and Technology said this: "CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or the other ... every scientist knows this, but it doesn't pay to say so." Now why would a learned man say such a crazy thing? This is where the looney left gets lost. Their mantra is atmospheric CO2 levels are escalating and this is unquestionably causing earth's temperature rise. But ask yourself -- if global temperatures are experiencing the biggest sustained drop in decades, while CO2 levels continue to rise -- how can it be true? Ironically, in spite of being shown false, we must now pray for it. Because a massive study, just released by the Russian Government, contains overwhelming evidence that earth is on the verge of another Ice Age. Based on core samples from Russia's Vostok Station in Antarctica, we now know earth's atmosphere and temperature for the last 420,000 years. This evidence suggests that the 12,000 years of warmth we call the Holocene period is over. Apparently, we're headed into an ice age of about 100,000 years -- give or take. As for CO2 levels, core samples show conclusively they follow the earth's temperature rise, not lead it. It turns out CO2 fluctuations follow the change in sea temperature. As water temperatures rise, oceans release additional dissolved CO2 -- like opening a warm brewsky. To think, early last year, liberals suggested we spend 45 trillion dollars and give up five million jobs to fix global warming. But there is good news: now that we don't have to spend any of that money, we can give it all to the banks. For more articles by Mr. Tomlinson click this link: http://www.mlive.com/opinion/flint/index.ssf/john_tomlinson/ |
||
|
6
on: December 07, 2009, 12:22:42 AM
|
||
| Started by Monte Wells - Last post by genrichkarlovichjr | ||
|
It is really an alarming thing to happen. I am worried about the rise in sea level in those areas directly affected by Antarctic glaciers. And my worst dream about global warming are just coming to reality, I think we had lost the time for tackling global warming.
|
||
|
7
on: November 30, 2009, 08:55:21 AM
|
||
| Started by Monte Wells - Last post by Monte Wells | ||
|
I'm not sure what's happening because it works on my end, but here is a link to my channel. Under see all you will find the Hole in the Rock Video.
http://www.youtube.com/welsmj64#p/u |
||
|
8
on: November 30, 2009, 05:37:25 AM
|
||
| Started by Monte Wells - Last post by Empota | ||
|
if the youtube admin remove the video or the uploader remove it, you cannot get it.
|
||
|
9
on: November 29, 2009, 04:06:32 AM
|
||
| Started by Monte Wells - Last post by D.Evick | ||
|
rnyeah your right now that i think about it. there is no soil. I guess i should have said soiless.rn
|
||
|
10
on: November 28, 2009, 03:34:11 PM
|
||
| Started by Monte Wells - Last post by Monte Wells | ||
|
I'm not sure what Murillos New Star Car is so maybe you can fill us in.
|
||